skip to Main Content

Iran Decrypted VIII: The Killings in Zahedan

Zahedan

Iran Decrypted VIII: The Killings in Zahedan

As modern conflict moves away from hard industrial war to soft information warfare, the recent political unrest in Iran must be analyzed from a new global perspective, one that recognizes the convergence of historical contexts, present-day challenges, and future impacts within an international framework.

zahedan

Iran Decrypted VIII: The Killings in Zahedan

As modern conflict moves away from hard industrial war to soft information warfare, the recent political unrest in Iran must be analyzed from a new global perspective, one that recognizes the convergence of historical contexts, present-day challenges, and future impacts within an international framework.

Written by: Sara Salimi | Copy Editors: Zainabrights, Fatima Alhajri | Design: Fatima El-Zein | Consultants: Fiza Raza, Batool Subeiti

The “Zahedan Massacre,” also called the “Bloody Friday,” took place in Iran’s Sistan and Baluchestan province that killed 35 civilians according to state news, including six members of the security forces [12]. Human rights organizations outside Iran reported over 90 deaths during protests on September 30, 2022 [8].

This incident was the deadliest since the onset of nationwide unrest over Mahsa Amini’s death and has attracted significant global attention. Headlines read that Iranian security officers opened fire on civilians following Friday prayers, after which the Sunni-majority Baluch population participated in protests, this time with additional local grievances over the alleged rape of a teenage Baluchi girl by a police officer [10].

As with most news reporting, things are seldom as simple as they appear, and the events surrounding this protest are no exception. Video footage of the incident reveals that a group of more than 150 men attacked a police station near the Grand Musalla where Friday prayers took place. Some of the crowd members were armed with guns and weapons as they broke into the station “with the aim of seizing control of it,” according to an Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) statement.

In response, security forces responded with tear gas and live fire, which resulted in the deaths of both the rioters and innocent civilians.

The released video footage of the Zahedan protests shows that the protestors were almost certainly exclusively men. The protests in other Iranian cities had an overwhelming female presence and were often reported as “women-led protests” [11]. What happened in Zahedan was clearly different from what was happening throughout other regions in Iran.

The poverty-stricken Sistan and Baluchestan province has historically been a flashpoint for clashes with security forces, drug smuggling gangs, and extremist groups [12]. This is no secret to the Iranian people, who have previously mourned the killing of innocent civilians and security forces in Zahedan over terror attacks by extremists groups, such as Jundullah [13]. This militant organization, which has also been designated as a terrorist organization by the US, is widely known for fermenting unrest in the Sistan and Baluchestan province for decades. It has carried out killings, suicide bombings, and armed attacks in mosques and other public settings [14].

Image Source: Middle East Monitor

These facts about the nature of the Zahedan protests should not reduce the significance of the resulting civilian deaths. The history of militant groups and political unrest in the region complicates the matter of assessing an appropriate use of force. Specifically in this situation, it raises important questions about the consequences of allowing potentially militant groups to gain access to government weapons and ammunition stockpiles.

Any action by a government agency resulting in the death of civilians requires intense scrutiny. Even if they acted reasonably considering the looming threat of a violent riot, the details leading up to the civilian deaths should be heavily scrutinized and understood, however it is also a reality that it is not in the interest of government agencies to kill innocent people during this sensitive period, as that would incite further unrest which they seek to quell to restore security, whilst the the point of weapon smuggling and rioting is to cause civilian death which leads to further chaos.

After conducting an investigation into the Zahedan killings, Iranian security council officials concluded that there was “negligence on the part of some officers” which “resulted in the injury and death of a number of civilians who were praying as well as uninvolved passerby” [31]. The Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) issued a statement following the council investigation announcing the dismissal of the chief of Zahedan police and the commander of the police station, and vowed to compensate the families of the innocent victims [9]. 

These victims were not among the armed groups breaking into the police station. The IRNA statement clarified that a number of armed militants exploited the atmosphere to attack civilians, vandalize public property, and create a public safety hazard, which required intervention by security forces.

Written by: Sara Salimi | Copy Editors: Zainabrights, Fatima Alhajri | Design: Fatima El-Zein | Consultants: Fiza Raza, Batool Subeiti

If you value our journalism…

TMJ News is committed to remaining an independent, reader-funded news platform. A small donation from our valuable readers like you keeps us running so that we can keep our reporting open to all! We’ve launched a fundraising campaign to raise the $10,000 we need to meet our publishing costs this year, and it’d mean the world to us if you’d make a monthly or one-time donation to help. If you value what we publish and agree that our world needs alternative voices like ours in the media, please give what you can today.

Back To Top