skip to Main Content

Iran Decrypted VII: Foreign Influence in Iran

Foreign Influence In Iran

Iran Decrypted VII: Foreign Influence in Iran

As modern conflict moves away from hard industrial war to soft information warfare, the recent political unrest in Iran must be analyzed from a new global perspective, one that recognizes the convergence of historical contexts, present-day challenges, and future impacts within an international framework.

Foreign influence in iran

Iran Decrypted VII: Foreign Influence in Iran

As modern conflict moves away from hard industrial war to soft information warfare, the recent political unrest in Iran must be analyzed from a new global perspective, one that recognizes the convergence of historical contexts, present-day challenges, and future impacts within an international framework.

Written by: Sara Salimi | Copy Editors: Zainabrights, Fatima Alhajri | Design: Fatima El-Zein | Consultants: Fiza Raza, Batool Subeiti

While many are quick to dismiss the threat of direct and indirect foreign involvement in Iranian protests and riots, it cannot be ignored that the historic role of outside entities in escalating political unrest in Iran has been extremely destructive and divisive, especially after the 1979 Islamic Revolution when Western influence in Iranian domestic affairs became virtually nonexistent.

Image Source: NurPhoto via Getty

It is crucial to acknowledge that the violent reactions of Iranian police during riots does not negate the presence of foreign involvement in those same instances of violence, and the foreign influence does not mean the Iranian government is free of blame in times of political unrest. These two realities are not mutually exclusive, and have been present in varying degrees in both protests and within Iranian society as a whole.

There are many examples of the US undermining the will of a sovereign Iran and its people. From the 1953 CIA-orchestrated coup that overthrew Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mosadegh, to the US support for MEK, an organization once designated as terrorist by the US State Department, there have clearly always been Western interests in influencing the politics in Iran. In the eight-year Iran-Iraq war that broke out in 1980, the MEK fought alongside Saddam Hussein with US and western backing, even while he killed Iranian civilians and used chemical weapons [24]. The effects of the chemical poisoning are still evident today among the Iranian population, and serve as a bitter reminder of Western hypocrisy and its empty slogans of human rights.

If the 1953 CIA coup in Iran taught the Iranian people anything, it was that Western nations do not have the interest of the Iranians at heart. The US and UK overthrew Mossadegh despite the fact that he was democratically elected, led a secular democracy, and had overwhelming support among Iranians as Prime Minister.

This raises a key question: if the United States considers itself a beacon of democracy, freedom, and human rights, why did it overthrow a democratically elected Iranian leader and restore power to Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, a man who lacked the respect and support of the Iranian people?

The answer lies in a critical point about Iranian sovereignty and independence. Mossadegh was a leader known for introducing a range of social and economic policies, the most significant being the nationalization of the Iranian oil industry [25]. Prior to his leadership, Britain was in control of Iran’s oil for decades through a Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Mossadegh broke off these negotiations and denied the British involvement in Iran’s oil industry. Having lost a major source of energy and wealth, Britain appealed to the US for help, which eventually led to Mossadegh’s being overthrown. The Shah who replaced him was willing to effectively sell Iran to the West, to a point where the nation had close to no autonomy over its own national policies and decisions.

Thus, it can be seen that Iranian opposition to foreign influence, and the suspicions over outside involvement in times of political unrest, is not an unusual analysis that is uncalled for. Iranians have every right to be critical of foreign influence in their nation, both directly and indirectly.

This was also proven in the Shah Cheragh terrorist attack, which killed over 15 innocent worshippers. Investigations concluded that the terrorist who coordinated the attack was an Azerbaijani national in contact with ISIS, and the shooter, Sebahan Kamrouni, was a citizen of Tajikistan [30].  The terrorists were reportedly planning more attacks in other cities including Zahedan, but a total of 26 of them were arrested by Iranian security and intelligence forces on Monday.

The Iranian Interior Minister, Ahmad Vahidi, stated that the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and several European countries directly incited unrest in Iran, and that “the leaders and organizers of those unrests were carefully trained in eight countries” [84]. He further added that rioters were frequently promised payment from foreign-backed opposition groups for causing unrest, including a 500,000 toman award for each molotov cocktail they made [86]. Vahidi also explained that these foreign nations attempted to transform current events into racial conflicts by pretending to favor and support certain Iranian ethnic minorities.

Image Source: Nejat Society
Image Source: Los Angeles Times

Additionally, Brigadier General Hassan Hassanzadeh announced in early November that at least 1,500 weapons of all kinds were confiscated from individuals working to destroy public properties and create insecurity and danger within the public sphere. Hassanzadeh further explained that many of the arrested rioters were dual nationals as well as foreign-related intelligence workers, MEK members, and a number of individuals planning to spread riots across the capital city [85]. Brigadier Ahmad Ali Goudarzi also reported that Iranian border guards have destroyed multiple trafficking rings and found over 600 war weapons in the process [85].

Several reports have also disclosed documents that attest to the role of Saudi, Bahraini, Emirati, and American involvement in the protests and riots within Iran. One such example is Al-Akhbar newspaper, which recalled a statement by Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad Bin Salman in 2017 about moving the battle to Iranian territories to keep the Saudi kingdom safe by spreading internal chaos within Iran. The Middle East Monitor also reported on Riyadh encouraging anti-government protests in Iran since the death of Mahsa Amini [88].

Written by: Sara Salimi | Copy Editors: Zainabrights, Fatima Alhajri | Design: Fatima El-Zein | Consultants: Fiza Raza, Batool Subeiti

If you value our journalism…

TMJ News is committed to remaining an independent, reader-funded news platform. A small donation from our valuable readers like you keeps us running so that we can keep our reporting open to all! We’ve launched a fundraising campaign to raise the $10,000 we need to meet our publishing costs this year, and it’d mean the world to us if you’d make a monthly or one-time donation to help. If you value what we publish and agree that our world needs alternative voices like ours in the media, please give what you can today.

Back To Top